Hurstpierpoint, Sussex.1
June 25, 1865.
My dear Hanbury /
The 4 Vols. of Kunth's2 Synopsis3 are surely dog-cheap — they are worth having if only to serve as a complete index of all Humboldt's4 plants.
Did you get the book De distributione geographica &c.[Latin: About the geographical distribution]5 — it was only 4/-
In the catalogue of N. American books you previously sent, I found the one whose heading I pre-pend6 to this letter. The author7, a very clever, shrewd, & somewhat eccentric Yankee physician, was U. S. Consul at Payta [Paita, Peru], where he gave me a copy of his Cosmography8, and also sundry bottles of his Sarsap[arilla]. + Gent[ian]. and told me what I wanted was "Rest — Rest — but, above all, to laugh some every day!"
Many thanks for the Daily News.9 I hope you have been to see Church's10 famous paintings, which are surely superior to those of Mignot11
[2] I was much interested by the review of Lecky's12 Progress of Rationalism13 — I suppose you may have read the work itself.
I have been pretty well since I came here, except for disordered bowels, which may arise from the heat & drought, but chiefly I believe from breathing the effluvium of dung-hills and dung-holes, such as exist in every garden by the side of the choicest flowers. I recollect being shocked 20 years ago with the admixture of sweet and vile odours in a Sussex village — much to the diversion of Mr. Borrer,14 to whom I was then on a visit. I am decidedly better on the cool days, b and could have liked to get to the hills for a short time this summer, but I find so much more work awaiting me than I had calculated on, that I fear there is no getting away from it.
I told you in my last that I was about to try my hand on the Lichens; but when I began to enquire into what progress had been made with the entire cryptogamic15 collection, I found that the Hepaticae were still altogether untouched, & they are as numerous in species as the Mosses and [3] their determination entails a vast deal of minute work. At the rate of progress hitherto made, it must take 3 or 4 years more to name & distribute the collection. Seeing this I wrote to ask Leighton16 to help me with the Lichens. He has consented, and offers to make up & distribute the sets at once, and name them afterwards, which will suit me very well. May I therefore trouble you to have printed 5000 Labels with the heading
SPRUCE _ LICHENES AMAZONICI et ANDINI
No.
and forward them to the
Rev. W. A. Leighton
Luciefelde near
Shrewsbury.
____________________
Pray do not get any more Moss-Labels printed until further notice from me.
I have set to work myself on the Hepaticae & if I find I am likely to break down under the task, I must try to get some one to aid me. I am familiar enough with the tribe, but want of physical strength & especially the pain in the right eye are great drawbacks. Had I known what there was to be done a month earlier, I think [4] I should have gone straight off to Hamburgh[sic] with them, where I should have had excellent aid from Dr. Gotteshe17 of Altona.18
As to the Mosses, Mitten19 has had them in his hands nearly two years & a half, & during that time has transferred the best specimens of everything to his own herbarium, & has studied them mostly likely sufficiently to be able to shine upon them some day; but the work of making up sets is barely begun, and many of the specimens have got sorely tossed about & maltreated. Moreover, my MSS. notes on those mosses were also put into his hands, containing minute analyses of a great many of the most striking species — especially of those that seemed typical of new groups — in all above 250 species, to most of which I had put names. The only stipulation I made with Mitten when I put collection & MSS. into his hands was that he should preserve my names wherever practicable; but he has never given any but shuffling20 answers when questioned about the matter, and I find now that he has quashed every one of my names & substituted others of his own, evidently awaiting my dying off, so he might be able to take all the credit to himself, & perhaps, if he mentioned my MSS. names at all, quote them as synonyms with some depreciatory remark tagged on to them.
[5] That was the way he did with Wilson's21 MSS. names in the Indian Mosses, as you may see by referring to his account of them in [the] Linn[ean]. Journ[al]. Suppl[ement].,22 and has thus (I find) disgusted everybody who takes an interest in the subject.
Little as I esteem mere species-mongering it is annoying to find the man to whom I had entrusted my fair fame, trying to rob me of the little of it that could accrue to me. And this tribe of the Mosses is one of which I have made an especial study, & have collected in S. America more systematically than anyone ever did before. I think my only remedy is that, as Mitten has ignored my names, I ought equally to ignore his; & when he presents his account of my Mosses to the Linn[ean]. Journal Society, to be ready also with one of my own, & to protest publicke23 against such a way of treating the man who has risked his life times without number & wasted the best years of his life in catering for the pleasure & the fame of others.
Excuse my troubling you with this matter
& believe me | Ever truly yours | Richd Spruce. [signature]
D[aniel]. Hanbury Esq.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP5610.6377)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP5610,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on