[1]1
ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
LINCOLN’S INN FIELDS
LONDON. W.C.2.
8th Jan[uary]. 1932
Dear Mr Wallace2,
I am indebted to you for helpful criticism. It is quite true that the palato-cerebral ratio3 is not an exact index of mental — or even cerebral — development — but it is, I think — as good an indication of human status as is available now. No: both the measurements on pp [pages] 380-381 are right: the lower molars are always longer than the upper molars[.]
Yours very truly | Arthur Keith2 [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP6152.7122)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP6152,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 18 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP6152