WCP782

Letter (WCP782.954)

[1]

Parkstone, Dorset

Sept[embe]r 23rd 1901

My dear Canon Fowler,

I am afraid I cannot give you much information as to the facts you require; but I am sure that many tropical birds eat beetles, especially the larger Cuckoos, the Drongos ([Edrlins] etc.) some of the hawks and buzzards, in whose crops or stomachs I have often found elytra or parts of them. I think among the publications of the American Board of Agriculture you will find very full and detailed accounts of the results of the examination of [2] the stomachs of almost all N. American birds, and also something of the kind has been published in England, but I forget where.

Belt (Naturalist in Nicaragua, p. 317) states that Lampiyiadice and allies were invariably rejected by monkeys and fowls — he also refers to Mordellide mimicking wasps.

With regard to certain types of colouration prevailing in certain districts, we can only learn the reason by a consideration of all the conditions, & of the life history of the insects, and this can only be ascertained by resident naturalists. But there are certain general principles which enable us to make a very good guess in many [3] cases. E.G. The prevalence of dusky colours in the Madagascar beetles may be due to the altogether extraordinary abundance of the Lemur Trike, which being insectivorous, arboreal, & often nocturnal would be especially destructive to insects unless protected by some of the various modes, of which protective colourations is one of the most important.

Again, a general similarity in marking, may be brought about on what is now termed the "Mullerian" principle that, owing to all insect-eaters having to learn when young of which species are distasteful or injurious, a certain toll is each insect is exacted by them, and this toll is reduced exactly in proportion as more & more species so nearly resemble each other as to be apparently [4] almost identical — Lloyd George demonstrates this in his book on Instincts — hence if any simple pattern of working colour is acquired by one protected species, there is a tendency for many other species, both protected & non-protected to acquire similar colours & patterns (by variation & selection). Also protective markings may be acquired in the same way, & some very conspicuous markings when the species is in motion because highly protective when at rest in its natural surroundings.

The beginnings of such peculiar markings are, I believe, often due to the need for recognition on the first differentiation of species, and I have no doubt this acts with beetles as it certainly does with the higher animals.

Believe me yours very truly | Alfred R Wallace [signature]

Rev Canon Fowler

Published letter (WCP782.5640)

[1]1 [p. lviii]

If we endeavour to give any explanation of Müllerian mimicry, we are of course met by many objections. How did it arise? Is there enough ground to work upon? Are there any factors besides Natural Selection, and if so what are they? We cannot, of course, in the present state of our knowledge, give answers that will satisfy persistent objectors, but those who have at all studied the subject do not see any particular difficulty in recognising that in the keen struggle for existence Natural Selection and Variation may in time weed down two or more distasteful species until they resemble each other in minute particulars. Mimicry is a progressive and continuous process: it is playing a large part in the history of nature in the present, as it has done in the past and will continue to do in the future. In a letter which I received a short time ago from Dr. Alfred Russel Wallace, after saying that the toll of each insect exacted by insect-eaters is reduced exactly in proportion as more and more species so nearly resemble each other as to be apparently almost identical, he writes as follows:—"Hence if any simple pattern of warning colour is acquired by one protected species, there is a tendency for many other species, both protected and non-protected, to acquire similar colours and patterns (by variation and selection). Also protective markings may be acquired in the same way, and some very conspicuous markings, when the insect is in motion, become highly protective when it is at rest in its natural surroundings." The latter remark is very important: we are too apt to forget the necessity of taking environment into consideration.

Dr. Wallace is further of opinion that the beginnings of such peculiar markings are often due to the need for recognition on "the first differentiation of species, and does not doubt but that this acts with beetles as it certainly does with higher animals": such may be the case, but it hardly seems probable.

Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: Letter excerpt included in Fowler's 1902 annual presidential address to the Entomological Society of London, as embedded below. Published on page lviii of that Society's Proceedings series for the year 1901

Please cite as “WCP782,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP782