Search: Darwin Correspondence Project in contributor 
Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
Maw, George in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 28 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
8 Nov 1880
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/18)
Summary:

Believes the flexure in GM’s dead animals must result from the greater strength of the muscles on the left side. Thinks his son George once tested the strength of each leg of a group of boys, and CD could get his notes if wanted.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
17 Mar [1861]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/4)
Summary:

Thanks GM for his excellent criticisms. His observations on the classification of minerals force him to "own that classification may be closely like that due to descent yet have no relation to it".

Asks whether GM has observed any cases of "bud-variations".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
13 July [1861]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/5)
Summary:

Thanks GM for his fair review [of Origin, Zoologist 19 (1861): 7577–611].

Feels it is a pity to mingle science and religion;

explains why he did not deal with the case of man.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
19 July [1861]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/6)
Summary:

Has read GM’s review and thanks him for its fair and liberal spirit. Discusses briefly several specific difficulties raised by it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
31 Aug [1861]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/7)
Summary:

Would welcome any facts on correlation, or GM’s criticisms. Explains how natural selection could produce apparent correlation of characters, but feels GM’s Pelargonium example must arise from the leaves and petals being similarly affected at an early stage by an unknown cause.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
3 July [1862]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/8)
Summary:

Thinks GM’s Pelargonium is a case of true correlated characters. Feels secondary sexual characters are only accidental correlations; does not see the same necessity for close simultaneous development of certain characters as GM does.

Will forward a copy of his Orchids.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
28 Feb [1863]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/9)
Summary:

Thanks GM for a curious lily.

Recommends some papers on coal.

Gives his opinion on the importance of forming theories if one is to be a good and original observer.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
12 May [1863]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/10)
Summary:

Believes GM’s human bones from Gibraltar must be of very doubtful age. Lyell agrees, but feels any skull found should be forwarded to George Busk or Hugh Falconer.

Suggests GM look carefully for shells in the drift.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
4 June [1865]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/12)
Summary:

Believes GM’s reported monstrosity is not rare. Does not believe it resulted from the effect of the imagination of the mother on her offspring.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
21 June [1866]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/13)
Summary:

Thanks GM for a specimen; it is a sport with which he is already familiar.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
13 Jan 1869
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/14)
Summary:

Thanks GM for offer of observations. Would be interested to know when the horns of merino rams first appear,

and has long wished for living specimens of Drosophyllum.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
17 Jan [1869]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/15)
Summary:

Describes Drosophyllum and its habitat.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
27 Apr [1869]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/16)
Summary:

Thanks GM for specimens of Drosophyllum; by a strange coincidence CD has also received plants from a correspondent in Oporto [W. C. Tait].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
22 May [1869]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/17)
Summary:

Thanks GM for specimens of Drosophyllum.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Nov 1880
Source of text:
DAR 171: 106
Summary:

He has observed several instances of animals’ tails lying to the left in rigor mortis. Is this a general rule?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Mar 1861
Source of text:
DAR 171.1(3): 95
Summary:

Asks for a testimonial for Edward Newman.

Discusses the Origin, considers natural selection works well when applied to the evolution of nations and groups of men; on the other hand feels the classification of mineral elements is a damaging analogy as it parallels organic classification but could not be derived by any evolutionary means.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Aug [1861]
Source of text:
DAR 99: 11–12
Summary:

Thanks CD for his letter about GM’s review of the Origin.

Sends instances of correlative organisation and functions which he finds difficult to believe could have accumulated by gradual modifications.

[Letter erroneously dated 1862 by GM.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 June 1862
Source of text:
DAR 99: 5–9
Summary:

Discusses cases of assumed correlation, e.g., facial hair and generative organs, sexual characters in castrated oxen. Finds it difficult to see how correlation of functions which would be useless separately can be accumulated gradually through natural selection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 July 1862
Source of text:
DAR 171.1: 96
Summary:

Thanks CD for sending Orchids.

Reports observations by his uncle relating to the successful breeding of a male mule with a horse.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 171: 97
Summary:

Discusses the structure and particular uniformities of the Shropshire coal-seams and surrounding strata; speculates on their origins.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project