Search: letter in document-type 
Darwin, C. R. in addressee 
1860-1869::1865 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 148 items

From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Jan [1865]
Source of text:
DAR 106: B22–3
Summary:

Sends papers with comments. Convinced that the Aru pig is a species peculiar to New Guinea fauna, not a domestic animal that ran wild.

Admires CD’s paper ["Three forms of Lythrum", Collected papers 2: 106–31].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 January [1865]
Source of text:
  • Cambridge University Library: DAR 106: B22-23
  • British Library, The: BL Add. 46434 f. 51-52
  • Wallace Family Collection (private collection)
  • Marchant, J. (Ed.). (1916). In: Alfred Russel Wallace; Letters and Reminiscences. Vol. 1. London & New York: Cassell & Co. [pp. 161-162]
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Alfred Russel Wallace Correspondence Project
From:
William Erasmus Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[late Feb–May 1865]
Source of text:
DAR 108: 89a
Summary:

[Outline sketches of pollen from short-styled yellow primrose and from long-styled yellow and red primroses.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Feb 1865
Source of text:
DAR 102: 8–9
Summary:

Falconer’s illness and suffering. His great ability and knowledge.

CD’s paper ["Climbing plants"] went extremely well [at Linnean Society]. M. T. Masters and Bentham commented.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Maxwell Tylden Masters
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Feb 1865
Source of text:
DAR 171: 71
Summary:

MTM heard part of the abstract of CD’s paper on climbing plants, read at the Linnean Society on 2 Feb. Offers CD his opinion and information on the subject, which he has studied for many years.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
August Schleicher
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 Feb 1865
Source of text:
DAR 177: 53
Summary:

Sends a pamphlet and photograph to CD [missing];

announces a botanical congress at Erfurt at which CD’s theory will be discussed.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[17 Feb 1865]
Source of text:
DAR 102: 10–11
Summary:

Why botanists will not subscribe to Falconer’s bust with enthusiasm.

Scott has been offered curatorship at Calcutta Botanic Garden.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Busk
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1865
Source of text:
DAR 160: 380
Summary:

On a proposed meeting of friends of the deceased Hugh Falconer to decide on a memorial to him. Invites CD’s support.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[27 Feb 1865?]
Source of text:
DAR 102: 12
Summary:

Will arrive Saturday [4 Mar] on afternoon train.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[28 Feb – 5 Mar 1865]
Source of text:
DAR 178: 64
Summary:

Encloses some poultry feathers.

Will read over and return CD’s MS on fowls. Has been delayed by an eye injury.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Benjamin Dann Walsh
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
1 Mar 1865
Source of text:
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago
Summary:

Sends his paper on "Willow-galls" [Proc. Entomol. Soc. Philadelphia 3 (1864): 543–644].

Lengthy criticism of Agassiz’s views on species as stated in his Essay on classification [1857].

Interested by CD’s trimorphism in Lythrum. Thinks some great mystery may lie in the fact that in some genera, some species are tri-, some di-, and some monomorphic, and in other genera, Apis, Vespa, Bombus, all the known species are dimorphic.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Frederick Ransome
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 99: 19–20
Summary:

Requests a postponement of payment on a note for £100.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Frederick Ransome
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 99: 22–3
Summary:

Thanks CD for his consideration in meeting his convenience respecting the payment of the £100.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Rudolph Heine
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 166: 134
Summary:

Admires Origin, but CD does not consider hereditary law of use and disuse.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[10 Mar 1865]
Source of text:
DAR 102: 13–14
Summary:

Thomas Thomson has gone over Scott’s paper; encloses his conclusions. Not fit for publication in present form. His experiments should have been repeated to resolve his disagreement with Gärtner.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 178: 63
Summary:

Will return page on pigeons.

Has concluded his crossing experiments and found no trace of hybrid sterility or loss of fertility.

The Field is publishing a series of papers on different pigeon varieties [24 (1864): 366, 395, 459; 25 (1865): 115, 139, 155, 228, 258].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Francis Trevelyan (Frank) Buckland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 160: 359
Summary:

Introduces Cholmondely Pennell of the Admiralty, who wants to speak to CD about a literary matter.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Stewardson Brady
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 160: 276
Summary:

CD’s statement in Origin that clover is utterly dependent on humble-bee for fertilisation has been questioned by his friend’s evidence of visits by other insects. Asks CD’s opinion.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Walter Bates
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 160: 80
Summary:

Expresses pleasure at signs of CD’s recovery.

HWB’s work on the identification of species of the genus Colobthea; relates the large number of modifications that occur in the sexual organs of closely allied species. Does not doubt that this contributes greatly to multiplication of species in nature.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 and 26 Mar 1865
Source of text:
DAR 170: 50
Summary:

JL’s MS at printer’s [Prehistoric times (1865)].

Apologises for failure to post letter.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project