Announces CD’s election as Honorary Member of the Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou.
Announces CD’s election as Honorary Member of the Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou.
No summary available.
No summary available.
Explains why he has declined writing a review for Messrs Appleton.
Willy is back from New Zealand. JDH perturbed by what to do with him.
J. W. Dawson’s Bakerian lecture for Royal Society is full of errors, and JDH is forced to recommend that it not be published. [An abstract of the lecture was published: "On the pre-Carboniferous floras of north-eastern America", Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 18 (1869–70): 333–5.]
Intends to see Adam Sedgwick.
Arranges to meet AN.
Will visit JH on 27 May.
About an application to the B.A.A.S. for a grant to fund the calculations related to reducing the magnetic observations of 1847-48.
No summary available.
Apologizes for delay in responding to JH. Wrote to JH yesterday about AM's plan to visit Collingwood.
No summary available.
Concern about futures of Willy [Hooker] and Horace [Darwin].
Henrietta [Darwin] back from Cannes.
CD has been to Cambridge to visit Frank [Darwin]. Saw Sedgwick, who took him to the [Geological] Museum and utterly exhausted him. Humiliating to be "killed by a man of 86".
Saw Alfred Newton.
CD has been working away on man, to much greater length (as usual) than expected,
and on cross- and self-fertilisation.
Does JDH happen to have seeds of Canna warszewiczii matured in some hot country?
Sympathises with JDH on Dawson’s paper – amusing that Dawson hashes up E. D. Cope’s and L. Agassiz’s views.
ARW.
Behaviour of ants.
Thanks for copy of part one of EPW’s Spicilegia biologica (Wright 1870).
Not discouraged by F. Müller’s Passiflora.
Observations on insects visiting barberries.
No summary available.
Has finished the article [on the action of the eyelids in Ned. Arch. Geneeskd. & Natuurkd. 5 (1870), also see 7238]; summarises: the occlusion of the eyelids protects the vessels, and the eye itself, against the danger of pressure caused by excessive expiratory action. The weakness of the conclusion is that the extent of the danger caused by the pressure to the normal state of the eye is not precisely known.
No summary available.
Appreciates JH's opinion regarding variability of climate, although it disagrees with his own. His views are not provable and the question remains one of probability.