Zoological Station | Naples
March 22, 1877
My dear Sir,
I have to point out a curious mistake in your “Crossing”-book, which I found out too late.1
You speak of cleistogenous flowers and quote Kuhn’s paper in the Botan. Zeitung 1867, p 65. But here Kuhn as well as later authors (H. Müller f i.) call this form of flowers “cleistogamous”, so that the term corresponds to dichogamous. I found a copy of the Botan. Zeitung and of Müller’s book here in Naples, so that I could refer to them I have now mentioned it in an Erratum; in a second Edition it has to be altered throughout, I think2 A young botanist, who works here at the station, was struck by my speaking of cleistogenous flowers and Termites, and this made me look at the original paper.
I have to beg your pardon for not having been attentive enough. But as I have not got the Botanische Zeitung myself and as Botany is now rather rich in new terms, I took the word as you had given it.
After rather severe cold for this latitude the spring commences at last. But I scarcely wanted any cheering up, for my work has always been exceedingly nice. Dr Dohrn has done an immense service to science by his Station.3 He desires me to remember him to you and your family.
I have not sent my photo, neither to Haeckel nor to Harting in commemoration of your birthday, because you have it already and because I thought, that you would trust on my most sincere devotion and heartfelt thankfulness for all you have done as a man of science and as the kindest friend, without a public testimonial, which I don’t feel myself worth to give you4
Hoping that you have no reason to complain of your health I remain
My dear Sir, | Yours ever sincerely. | J. Victor Carus
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-10909,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on