Down | Beckenham Kent
Oct 9/79.
Dear Sir.
I hope that you will allow me to have the pleasure of thanking you for the very great pleasure which I have derived from just reading your paper on erratic blocks— The Map is wonderful. & what labour each of those lines show!1 I have thought for some years that the agency of floating ice, which nearly a century ago was overrated, has of late been underrated—2 You are the sole man who has ever noticed the distinction suggested by me between flat or planed scored rocks & mamillated scored rocks.—3
I do not think that I ever published any notice on the Ashley Heath Boulder—nor can I tell where to look for my memoranda of its size, when I had the ground excavated on one side & partly beneath it—but I remember that the hole was deep.—4 The block rested on rounded lumps of new Red Sandstone about as big as a child’s or man’s head; & one of these had been split into two halves & was deeply-scored, though the scores were short. I thought at the time that the boulder had fallen off floating ice, & had crushed & scored the block If it had fallen through the air so soft a rock would have been crushed into powder—
with great admiration for your paper | I remain dear Sir. | Yours faithfully | Ch Darwin.
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-12252,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on