My dear Lindley
I did not thank you for your two very kind notes until I heard from Hooker.2 All that he knows about Acropera luteola is that he “believes it was received under that name from Loddiges”.3 In structure it closely resembles A. Loddigesii, but is very different in colour, being all yellow. I enclose a mutilated specimen.—
The evidence from the rudimentary state of the ovules, & from the entrance into the stigmatic cavity being so contracted that the pollen-masses can rarely be inserted, & from other lesser reasons, seems sufficient to show that the Kew plant is a Male. Judging only from the contracted stigmatic cavity A. Loddigesii must be also a male.—4 I fear there is no chance of your recognising the mutilated fragment in Spirits. I begged Hooker to send me a dried Gongora flower that I might see whether that is (according to your suggestion) the Female, as far as the state of the pollen would show; but he does not say he will, but I hope he intends to do so.—5 I had no intention to be so troublesome to you; for I had not the most remote idea, but what A. luteola was a well-known name.
With cordial thanks | Yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-3350,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on