Dear Darwin
One line to say that the article is surely Owens & none others.2 I was certain of it on reading it, the expressions are identical with those of the Edr. Review,3 & the whole method of traduction is typical of Owen & unapproached by any one else.— so are the longwinded phrases, & so is the unutterable rubbish of the doctrine. Good Lord what rubbish & what vulgarity. I think there must be truth in a report I once heard—that he tippled.— Your doubt caused me to hunt up Carpenter today,4 who assures me it is so, both from his judgement, & from a conversation he had with Hepworth Dixon on Saturday about it—5 he is going to answer it—mildly.6
Froude7 told me today that Carlyle8 is a violent anti-Darwinian—of course it is of no consequence, but I should not have expected it.
Ever Yours affec | J D Hooker
I have just got sent a splendid Wedgwood of Dr Johnson!9
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-4098,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on