Greatham Vicarage Stockton on Tees
5 Sept. 1868.
My dear Sir
In Monticola cyanea the ♀ is less brightly coloured than the ♂ but not so as to render her less conspicuous, being a very dark mottled brown with some white.1 The ♀s of the Indian, Chinese, Phillipini, & So. African species differ similarly, & there is no exception in this genus.2 The question as to the Dromolæa leucopygia, & D. leucocephala is very curious, because in these species, as in Saxicola leucomela, there is no difference whatever in the sexual coloration.3 While there are species very slightly from these 3 respectively e.g. Drom. monacha, & Saxicola libanotica, where the female is a pale sandy colour, most inconspicuous,4 yet all inhabit the same localities, have precisely the same nidification, & the eggs are so alike, that only careful observation of the parent bird could decide to what species they belong. Yet the notes & flight of all the species are so distinct, it is impossible to confound the birds even at a distance.
I find a similar parallelism & contrast in the South African & Himalayan species.
Should you wish to examine for yourself, I shall be very happy to forward you a box of specimens of the various species carefully marked in pairs.
There is nothing more apparently capricious than the colouring of the ♀ in the Chat family,5 now identical, now most different in the closest allies— The contrast of blackbird & thrush in this respect is analogous—
Believe me | My dear Sir | Yrs very truly | H. B. Tristram
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-6351,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on