Oxford.
Wednesday | Feb 22. 1871.
My dear Sir,
I write to thank you very much for the copy of your work on the “Descent of Man” which came into my hands on Sunday—1
I have read a great deal of it already and with much pleasure— If I read rightly the two and a half lines at the bottom of the 403rd. page of your second Volume, they are an expression of dissent from certain of the teachings of Mr J. S. Mill, and contain a doctrine very necessary for these times—2
I trust that you will not compare me to a fly settling on the abraded spots in some large and magnificent animal if I point out one or two small matters which I think others may fix upon.
At p. 28. The supra condyloid foramen is not the same thing as the foramen of which Busk & Broca speak, and which is placed between the two condyles and connects when it exists (as it does within my own experience very frequently in Romano-British humeri) the two fossæ in which the olecranon & coronoid process of the ulna respectively play.3
“P. 54” in note 38 p. 28. should be 159.4
At p. 26. The greater liability of the wisdom teeth to decay is not confirmed by Tomes “Dental Physiology” pp. 140. 149. 192.5
You will think that I am possessed by a printer’s devil when I draw your attention to the fact that in your exquisitely beautiful story of the lapdog licking his mistress’s face the final s has got agglutinated to the f of face! see p. 78.6
P. 68. I fear that Dr McCann who is no doubt a patriotic Scotchman will attack you with severity for not having mentioned that Burns (whom he will call “the immortal Burns”) anticipated Professor Braubach in his views as to the dog’s regarding man as man looks upon God—7
At p. 21. The ear of the Porcupine is wonderfully like ours. I have often thought of this similarity but do not, the least, know how to explain it.8
With my very sincere acknowledgments | I am | Yours very Truly | George Rolleston
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-7506,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on