Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.
Nov. 27th
My dear George
I cannot think so poorly of the cousin paper as you do, & I certainly think you ought to offer it to Dr Farr & offer him to look at it, before you send it to Manchester.— The London Socy would also, I shd. think, be a more lasting & better vehicle.—2
What a man you are for work & new ideas.— Do not for Heavens sake hurry Stanton, as Pol. Econ is so abstruse & important a subject.—3 I doubt from Jevons’ book whether he is so mealy mouthed, & am very glad he has been buttering you up.—4 I think I understand a little what you are about with respect to collisions: anyone would have guessed with twice the number of ships there wd. only have been twice the collisions.5
I expect the viscous work will be very stiff & perhaps a failure.6 I remember about 20 years ago apropos of Glaciers & Forbes there were endless discussions on movements of viscous matter, & some one tried pitch on a large scale. I fancy Hopkins wrote on subject; but he was in favour of sliding.7
You will soon receive sheets of Descent,8 for I got my bound copies yesterday. I am glad your days at least are not very bad.
Yours affect | C. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-9735,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on