Hamstead, Birmingham | 6th Nov: 1860
My dear Sir,
I am much obliged for your note1. I have directly explained to Lieut. Hyeen that he must not make any communication to others until he has the revised report2.
In reference to the term ‘focus’, allow me to suggest the insertion of a definition simply, in a postscript or elsewhere3, if you think it worth while to regard this point at all.
Considering a section of the reflectors made by a plane through the vertical axis of the whole apparatus, the ‘focus’ (as intended in your report) is the common point of intersection, within the apparatus, of the light transmitted from a distant object by the middle of each prism respectively.
Considering the whole apparatus of reflectors, the ‘focus’ becomes a circle (except where it is on the axis) the radius of that circle being the distance ‘aside’.
I am just going to Whitby. On my return I will furnish you with a statement of what has been done, in regard to permanent adjustment[.]
Most truly yours | J.T. Chance
Professor Faraday | &c &c
Endorsed by Faraday: Sent him my figures <(45)>4
Please cite as “Faraday3880,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 5 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday3880