Faraday to Peter Henry Berthon   15 February 1864

Royal Institution | 15 Feby 1864

Sir

I have received & examined samples of White and Red lead1 with the following results White lead S and W Tudor

“Do <-> Pontifex and Wood

No adulterative substance or make weight that I can discover has been added to either of them and as far as I can judge as regards their manufacture they are unexceptionable. I have not estimated the quantity of oil in them. The difference is small & in fact, when a specimen has stood some time in a given position there is more difference between a part from the bottom and another from the top than there is between two different specimens such as those sent me.

There were five specimens of ground Red lead namely

W. Clerke2

P[ilcher]. and J[eremiah].

W.A. Rose3

Level Franks & Co4.

T.H. [sic] Smiths5

These were all very much alike in their characters & quality. I could find no adulteration in any of them and have reason to believe they are all unexceptionable

Some delay has occurred in my reply to your letter but I have been seriously ill during the past cold season. Dr Bence Jones my (Medical friend) ascribes some of my loss of power to the severe attack of sea sickness which I had between Dover and Dungeness and forbids me from going to sea again6[.]

Ever My dear Sir | Very Truly Yours | M. Faraday7

P.H. Berthon Esqr | &c &c &c

Sent with letter 4429.
William Clarke. Oil and colourman of 216 Upper Whitecross Street. POD.
William Anderson Rose. Supplier of red lead of 66 Upper Thames Street. POD.
Unidentified.
Thomas Wontner Smith (d.1867, age 61, GRO). Colour manufacturer.
Faraday was at sea on 17 November 1863 when he was sea sick. See letter 4406.
This letter was read to Trinity House Wardens Committee, 16 February 1864, LMA CLC/526/MS 30025/31, p.369-70. Clarke was given the order for red lead and Tudor for white.

Please cite as “Faraday4431,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday4431