[1]1
9, St. Mark’s Crescent N.W
March 11th. [1867]2
Dear Darwin
I return your queries3 but can not answer them with any certainty. For the Malays I should say Yes. to 1. 3. 8. 9. 10. & 17. and No. to 12. 13. and 16. but I cannot be certain in any one. But do you think these things are of much importance? I am inclined to think that if you could get good direct observations you would find these some of them often differ from tribe to tribe, from island to island and sometimes from village to village. Some no doubt [2] may be deep-seated, and would imply organic differences but can you tell beforehand which these are. I presume the Frenchman shrugs his shoulders whether he is of the Norman[,] Breton or Gaulish stock. Would it not be a good thing to send your List of queries to some of the Bombay [Mumbai] & Calcutta [Kolkata] papers as there must be numbers of Indian judges & other officers who would be interested & would send you hosts of replies.
The Australian papers & N.[ew] Zealand might also publish them & [3] then you would have a fine basis to go on.
Is your essay on Variation in Man4 to be a supplement to your volume on Domesticated Animals & cultivated Plants5? I would rather see your second volume on "The Struggle for Existence &c."6 for I doubt if we have a sufficiency of fair & accurate facts to do any thing with Man. Huxley7 I believe is at work upon it.
I have been reading Murray’s8 volume on Geog[raphical]. Dist[ribution]. of Mammals9. He has some good ideas here and there but is quite unable to understand Natural Selection, and makes a most [4] absurd mess of his criticism of your views on Oceanic Islands10.
By the bye what an interesting volume the whole of your materials on that subject would I am sure make11.
Yours very sincerely | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
P.S. I mentioned the Catterpillar question12 at the Ent[omological]. Soc[iety]. on Monday13 & think we shall have observations made this summer. Many members seemed to think that known facts favoured my view.
Larvae of Cucullia verbasci &c. often swarm for sp[ecies]. of verbascum are very showy and conspicuous and never seem to be eaten by birds. The larvae of Callimorpha jacobeae, are a similar case.
ARW. [signature]
There are lines in blue crayon and pencil marking certain passages of
text by Charles Darwin. See Darwin Correspondence Project <https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-5437.xml> [accessed 5 October 2020].
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP1876.4057)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
To C. Darwin.) 9, St. Mark's Crescent, N.W. March 11th1 [1867]2
Dear Darwin I return your queries3 but can not answer them with any certanty [sic]. For the Malays I should say Yes. to 1, 3, 8. 9. 10. & 17. and No. to 12. 13. and 16. but I cannot be certain in any one. But do you think these things are of much importance? I am inclined to think that if you could get good direct observations you would find some of them often differ from tribe to tribe, from island to island, and sometimes from village to village. Some no doubt may be deep-seseated, and would imply organic differences but can you tell beforehand which these are. I presume the Frenchman shrugs his shoulders whether he is of the Norman[,] Breton or Gaulish stock. Would it not be a good thing to send your List of Queries to some of the Bombay [Mumbai] & Calcutta[Kolkata] papers as there must be numbers of Indian judges & other officers who would be interested & would send you hosts of replies. The Australian papers & N[ew]. Zealand might also publish them & — — — — — —4
[2] [p. 2] To C. Darwin.) Last page of a letter (?)18675
…..... .then you would have a fine basis to go on.
Is your essay on Variation in Man6 to be a suuplement [sic] to your volume on Domesticated Animals & cultivated Plants7? I would rather see your second volume on "The Struggle for Existence &c."8 for I doubt if we have a sufficiency of fair & accurate facts to do anything with man. Huxley9 I believe is at work upon it.
I have been reading Murray's10 volume on Geog[raphical]. Dist[ribution]. of Mammals11. He has some good ideas here and there but is quite unable to understand Natural Selection, and makes a most absurd mess of his crit criticism of your views on Oceanic Islands12.
By the bye what an interesting volume the whole of your materials on that subject would I am sure make13.
Yours very sincerely Alfred R. Wallace.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Transcription (WCP1876.1766)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
[1] [p.1]
To C. Darwin.) 9, St. Mark’s Crescent, N.W. March 11th. [1867]1
Dear Darwin I return your queries2 but can not answer them with any certanty [sic]. For the Malays I should say Yes. to 1, 3, 8. 9. 10. & 17. and No. to 12. 13. and 16. but it cannot be certain in any one. But do you think these things are of much importance? I am inclined to think that if you could get good direct observations you would find some of them often differ from tribe to tribe, from island to island and sometimes from village to village. Some no doubt may be deep-seseated, and would imply organic differences but can you tell beforehand which these are. I presume the Frenchman shrugs his shoulders whether he is of the Norman[,] Breton or Gaulish stock. Would it not be a good thing to send your List of Queries to some of the Bombay [Mumbai] & Calcutta [Kolkata] papers as there must be numbers of Indian judges & other officers who would be interested & would send you hosts of replies. The Australian papers & N[ew]. Zealand might also publish them & — — — — — —3
[2] [p. 2] To C. Darwin.) Last page of a letter (?)18674
…..... .then you would have a fine basis to go on.
Is your essay on Variation in Man5 to be a suuplement [sic] to your volume on Domesticated Animals & cultivated Plants6? I would rather see your second volume on "The Struggle for Existence &c."7 for I doubt if we have a sufficiency of fair & accurate facts to do anything with man. Huxley8 I believe is at work upon it.
I have been reading Murray’s9 volume on Geog[raphical] Dist[ribution] of Mammals10. He has some good ideas here and there but is quite unable to understand Natural Selection, and makes a most absurd mess of his crit criticism of your views on Oceanic Islands11.
By the bye what an interesting volume the whole of your materials on that subject would I am sure make12.
Yours very sincerely | Alfred R. Wallace.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Transcription (WCP1876.4520)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
[1] [p. 180]
9 St. Mark's Crescent, N.W. March 11, 1867.
Dear Darwin, — I return your queries1, but cannot answer them with any certainty. For the Malays I should say Yes to 1, 3, 8, 9, 10 and 17, and No to 12, 13 and 16; but I cannot be certain in any one. But do you think these things are of much importance? I am inclined to think that if you could get good direct observations you would find some of them often differ from tribe to tribe, from island to island, and sometimes from village to village. Some no doubt may be deep seated, and would imply organic differences; but can you tell beforehand which these are? I presume the Frenchman shrugs his shoulders whether he is of the Norman, Breton, or Gaulish stock. Would it not be a good thing to send your List of Queries to some of the Bombay [Mumbai] and Calcutta [Kolkata] papers? as there must be numbers of Indian judges and other officers who would be interested and would send you hosts of replies. The [2] [p. 181] Australian papers and New Zealand might also publish them, and then you would have a fine basis to go on.
Is your essay on Variation in Man2 to be a supplement to your volume on Domesticated Animals and Cultivated Plants3? I would rather see your second volume on "The Struggle for Existence, etc.,"4 for I doubt if we have a sufficiency of fair and accurate facts to do anything with man. Huxley5, I believe, is at work upon it.
I have been reading Murray's6 volume on the Geographical Distribution of Mammals7. He has some good ideas here and there, but is quite unable to understand Natural Selection, and makes a most absurd mess of his criticism of your views on oceanic islands8.
By the bye, what an interesting volume the whole of your materials on that subject would, I am sure, make9. — Yours very sincerely, ALFRED R. WALLACE.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Published letter (WCP1876.5959)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP1876,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 16 January 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP1876