Down.
Bromley.
Kent. S.E.
March 27 [1869]1
My dear Wallace
I must send a line to thank you, but this note will require no answer.— The very morning after writing I found that Elk was used for moose in Sweden, but I had been reading lately about Elk & moose in N. America.—
As you put the case in your letter2, which I think differs somewhat from your book3, I am inclined to agree, & had thought that a feather c[oul]d. hardly be increased in length until [2] it had first grown to full length, & therefore it w[oul]d be increased late in life & transmitted to corresponding age.— But the Crossoptilon pheasant & even common pheasant shows that the tail feathers can be developed very early.
Thanks for other facts, which I will reflect on, when I go again over my M.S.
I read all that you said [3] about the Dutch Government with much interest, but I do not feel I know enough to form any opinion against yours.
I shall be intensely Curious to read the Quarterly4: I hope you have not murdered too completely your own & my child. I have lately i.e. in new Edit[ion], of Origin 5 been moderating my zeal, & attributing much more to mere useless variability.— I did think [4] I w[oul]d send you the sheet, but I daresay you w[oul]d not care to see it, in which I discuss Nägeli[']s essay6 on Nat[ural]. selection, not affecting characters of no functional importance, & which yet are of high classificatory importance. Hooker7 was is pretty well satisfied with what I have said on this head. It will be curious if we have hit on similar conclusions.— You are about the last man in England, who would [5] deviate a hair's breadth from his conviction to please any Editor in the world.—
Yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin [signature]
P.S. After all I have thought of one question, but if I receive no answer I shall understand that (as is probable) you have8 [6] nothing to say:— I have seen it remarked that the men & women of certain tribes differ a little in shade or tint: but have you ever seen or heard of any difference which in tint between the 2 sexes, which did not appear to follow from a difference in habits of life?—
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP1919.1809)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
[1] [p. 240]
Down, Bromley, Kent, S.E. March 27, 1869.
My dear Wallace, — I must send a line to thank you, but this note will require no answer. This very morning after writing I found that "elk" was used for "moose" Sweden, but I had been reading lately about elk and moose in North America.
As you put the case in your letter, which I think differs somewhat from your book, I am inclined to agree, and had thought that a feather could hardly be increased in length [2] [p. 241] until it had first grown to full length, and therefore it would be increased late in life and transmitted to a corresponding age. But the, Crossoptilon pheasant, and even the common pheasant, show that the tail feathers can be developed very early.
Thanks for other facts, which I will reflect on when I go again over my MS.
I read all that you said about the Dutch Government with much interest, but I do not feel I know enough to form any opinion against yours.
I shall be intensely curious to read the Quarterly: I hope you have not murdered too completely your own and my child.
I have lately, i.e. in the new edition of the "Origin,"1 been moderating my zeal, and attributing much more to mere useless variability. I did think I would send you the sheet, but I daresay you would not care to see it, in which I discuss Nägeli's essay on Natural Selection not affecting characters of no functional importance, and which yet are of high classificatory importance.
Hooker is pretty well satisfied with what I have said on this head. It will he curious if we have hit on similar conclusions. You are about the last man in England who would deviate a hair's breadth from his conviction to please any editor in the world. — Yours very sincerely, CH. DARWIN.
P.S."After all, I have thought of one question, but if I receive no answer I shall understand that (as is probable) you have nothing to say. I have seen it remarked that the men and women of certain tribes differ a little in shade or tint; but have you ever seen or heard of any difference in tint between the two sexes which did not appear to follow from a difference in habits of life?
Status: Draft transcription [Published letter (WCP1919.6006)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP1919,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 11 October 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP1919