Down,
Beckenham, Kent.
[2 September 1872]1
My dear Wallace
I write a line to say that I understood, but I may of course have been mistaken, from Huxley2 that Bastian3 distinctly stated that he had watched the development of the scale of Sphagnum: I was astonished, as I knew the appearance of Sphagnum under a high power, & asked a second time; but I repeat that I may have been mistaken.— Busk4 told me that Sharpey5 had noticed the appearance of numerous infusoria [2] in one of the solutions not containing any nitrogen; & I do not suppose that any physiologist w[oul]d. admit the possibility of infusoria absorbing nitrogen gas.— Possibly I ought not to have mentioned fact statements made in private conversation, so please do not repeat them. I quite agree about the extreme importance of such men, as Cohn6, Trecul7 & [3] Carter8 having observed apparent cases of Heterogenesis.— At present I sh[oul]d. prefer any mad hypothesis, such as that every disintegrated molecule of the lowest forms can reproduce the parent-form; & that these molecules are universally distributed & that they do not lose their vital power until heated to such a temperature that they decompose like dead organic particles.
I am extremely grieved to hear about the museum: it is a great misfortune.9—
Yours most sincerely | C. Darwin [signature]
I have taken up old Botanical work & have given up all theories.—
[4] I quite agree about Howarth's paper10: he wrote to me & I told him that we differed so widely, it was of no use our discussing any point.
As for Galton's paper11, I have never yet been able fully to digest it: as far as I have, it has not cleared my ideas, & has only aided in bringing more prominently forwards the large proportion of the latent characters.—
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP1956.1846)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
[1] [p. 278]
Down, Beckenham, Kent. September 2, 1872.
My dear Wallace, I write a line to say that I understood — but I may of course have been mistaken — from Huxley1 that Bastian2 distinctly stated that he had watched the development of the scale of Sphagnum: I was astonished, as I knew the appearance of Sphagnum under a high power, and asked a second time; but I repeat that I may have been mistaken. Busk3 told me that Sharpey4 had noticed the appearance of numerous Infusoria5 in one of the solutions not containing any nitrogen; and I do not suppose that any physiologist would admit the possibility of Infusoria absorbing nitrogen gas. Possibly I ought not to have mentioned statements made in private conversation, so please do not repeat them.
I quite agree about the extreme importance of such men as Cohn6 [illegible]7 and Carter8 having observed apparent cases of heterogenesis. At present I should prefer any mad hypothesis, such as that every disintegrated molecule of the lowest forms can reproduce the parent-form, and that the molecules are universally distributed, and that they do not lose their vital power until heated to such a temperature that they decompose like dead organic particles.
I am extremely grieved to hear about the Museum: it is a great misfortune.9 — Yours most sincerely, | C. DARWIN.
I have taken up old botanical work and have given up all theories.
I quite agree about Howorth's10 paper: he wrote to me and I told him that we differed so widely it was of no use our discussing any point.
As for Galton's11 paper,12 I have never yet been able to fully digest it: as far as I have, it has not cleared my [2] [p. 279] ideas, and has only aided in bringing more prominently forward the large proportion of the latent characters.
Status: Draft transcription [Published letter (WCP1956.6054)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP1956,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 11 October 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP1956