Down,
Beckenham, Kent. [Sevenoaks, Kent]1
Oct. 20th [1872]2
My dear Wallace
I have thought that you w[oul]d. perhaps like to see enclosed specimen & extract from letter3 (translated from German by my son4) from Dr. W. Marshall, Zoological Assistant to Schlegel at Leyden (Leiden).5— Th Neither the specimens, nor extract. need be returned; & you need not acknowledge the receipt.— The resemblance is not so close, now that the fragments are gummed on card, as I at first [2] thought. Your review6 of Houzeau7 was very good: I skimmed through the whole gigantic book8, but you managed to pick at the places much better than I did for myself.— You are a born critic. What an admirable number that was of Nature.—
I am writing this at [3] Sevenoaks where we have taken a house for 3 weeks & have one more week to stay. We came here that I may get a little rest, of which I stood in much need.—
Ever yours | very sincerely | Ch. Darwin [signature]
With respect to what you say about the certain instincts of Ants having been acquired by experience or sense, have you kept [4] in mind that the neuters, have no progeny.— I wish I knew whether the fertile females, or queen, do the same work, (viz bringing placing the eggs in warm places &c) as the neuters do afterwards: If so the case w[oul]d. be comparatively simple; but I believe this is not the case, & I am driven to selection of varying preexisting instincts.—
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP1957.1847)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
[1] [p. 279]
Down, Beckenham, Kent. October 20, 1872.
My dear Wallace, — I have thought that you would perhaps like to see enclosed specimen and extract from letter (translated from the German by my son) from Dr. W. Marshall,1 Zoological Assistant to Schlegel2 at Leyden.3 Neither the specimen nor extract need be returned; and you need not acknowledge the receipt. The resemblance is not so close, now that the fragments are gummed on card, as I at first thought. Your review4 of Houzeau5 was very good: I skimmed through the whole gigantic book, but you managed to pick out the plums much better than I did for myself. You are a born critic. What an admirable number that was of Nature.6
I am writing this at Sevenoaks,7 where we have taken a house for three weeks and have one more week to stay. We came here that I may get a little rest, of which I stood in much need. — Ever yours very sincerely, | CH. DARWIN.
With respect to what you say about certain instincts of ants having been acquired by experience or sense, have you kept in mind that the neuters have no progeny? I wish I knew whether the fertile females, or queens, do the same work (viz. placing the eggs in warm places, etc.) as the neuters do afterwards; if so the case would be comparatively simple; but I believe this is not the case, and I am driven to selection of varying pre-existing instincts.
Status: Draft transcription [Published letter (WCP1957.6055)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP1957,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 11 October 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP1957