Down,
Beckenham, Kent.
Jan 13th [1873]1
My dear Wallace
I have read your Review with much interest,2, 3 & I thank you sincerely for the very kind spirit in which it is written. I cannot say that I am convinced by your criticisms. If you have ever actually observed a kitten sucking & pounding, with to extended toes, its mother, & then seen the same kitten when a little older doing the same thing on a soft shawl, & ultimately [2] an old cat (as I have seen) & do not admit that it is identically the same action, I am astonished.
With respect to the decapitated frog, I have always heard of Pflüger4 as a most trustworthy observer. If indeed anyone knows a frog's habits so well as to say that it [one word illeg. crossed out] never rubs off a bit of leaf or other object, which may stick to it though, in [3] the same manner as it did the acid, your objection w[oul]d. be valid. Some of Flouren's5 experiments, in
which he removed the cerebral anterior hemispheres from a pigeon, indicate that acts, apparently performed consciously, can be done without consciousness,— I presume through the force of habit, in which case it would appear that intellectual power is not brought into play.—
Several persons have made [4] suggestion & objection as yours about the hands being held up in astonishment: if there was any straining of the muscles, as with protruded arms under fright, I would agree: as it is I must keep to my old opinion, & I daresay you will say [one word illeg. crossed out] that I am an obstinate old blockhead.
My dear Wallace | Yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin [signature]
The Book has sold wonderfully; 9000 copies have now been printed.6
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP1959.1849)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
[1] [p. 280]
Down, Beckenham, Kent. January 13, 1873.
My dear Wallace, — I have read your review1 with much interest, and I thank you sincerely for the very kind spirit in which it is written. I cannot say that I am convinced by your criticisms.2 If you have ever actually observed a kitten sucking and pounding with extended toes its mother, and then seen the same kitten when a little older doing the same thing on a soft shawl, and ultimately an old cat (as I have seen), and do not admit that it is identically the same action, I am astonished. [2] [p. 281]
With respect to the decapitated frog,3 I have always heard of Pflüger4 as a most trustworthy observer. If, indeed, anyone knows a frog's habits so well as to say that it never rubs off a bit of leaf or other object, which may stick to its thigh, in the same manner as it did the acid, your objection would be valid. Some of Flourens'5 experiments, in which he removed the cerebral hemisphere from a pigeon, indicate that acts apparently performed consciously can be done without consciousness — I presume through the force of habit; in which case it would appear that intellectual power is not brought into play. Several persons have made such suggestions and objections as yours about the hands being held up in astonishment:6 if there was any straining of the muscles, as with protruded arms under fright, I would agree: as it is I must keep to my old opinion, and I daresay you will say that I am an obstinate old blockhead. — My dear Wallace, | yours very sincerely, | CH. DARWIN.
The book has sold wonderfully; 9,000 copies have now been printed.
Status: Draft transcription [Published letter (WCP1959.6057)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP1959,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 20 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP1959