Down Bromley Kent
22d. May / [18]60
My dear Hooker
I was very glad to see Thwaites'1 letter: he makes same objection almost totidem verbis2 as Lyell3 did at first. It was [a] great omission in my part not discussing this subject, (as I will if there be future Edition) for I think I can remove this difficulty.—
That is [a] curious fact about Beetle: something analogous is known in certain crustaceans; but hardly well enough made out in the case of Beetle to quote. — Have you Pyrolas at Kew4? if so for Heaven sake observe [2] curvature of pistil towards gangway to nectary. If Bees visit this plant, it is best of all to observe them.
You have turned the tables in case of Lavatera with a vengeance against me. Godron5 in his work "sur l’Espece"6 gives apparently the best & most carefully worked out cases, which I have met with, of seeds alive & long buried in earth.
I fear by appearance, Leschenaultia will not seed, possibly owing to conditions of life; for I can [3] see no sign of incipient fertilisation.—
I have had lately two most kind letters from A[sa]. Gray7, with 22£ [sic] from [the] American Publisher!8 I have had, also, [a] capital letter from Wallace, after reading the Origin.9
Lyell tells me that Binney10 has published in Proc[eedings]: of Manchester Soc[iet]y. paper trying to show that coal plants must have grown in very marine marshes—11 Do you remember how savage you were [4] long years ago at my broaching such a conjecture? —
I am sincerely sorry to hear about Carpenter’s12 disappointment, but I wonder he cares about it—
Poor Etty13 keeps nearly [the] same, but we think certainly improves a little.— Your kind expressions about her pleased me us much.—
My dear old friend | Yours affect[ionately] | C. Darwin [signature]
[5] P. S. As Horse-chesnuts [sic] have male flowers & hermaphrodite flowers I have begun wished to examine their pollen, & this has made me observe a thing which has surprised me.— All the flowers now open on my several trees are male with rudimentary pistil with pollen shedding; so that I began to think my memory had deceived me & that the pistil was never well developed; but on opening buds near [the] end of each little lateral twig of the flower-truss, I find plenty of hermaphrodite flowers with pistils well developed. So that on all my trees there has been a gigantic crop of quite useless [6] male flowers, with millions of pollen-grains wasted, for there is not a female flower nearly open.— Now will you just look if you think [the] fact odd enough at Kew at Horse chesnuts [sic]; any[?] only you must remember that your trees will be 7 or 10 days earlier than mine; so that I daresay your hermaphrodite flowers & males from [the] upper flower of each side twig will be open; but I daresay you will be able to see whether the lower flowers on each little side twig are exclusively male.— If this is [the] case elsewhere & in [a] native country, it w[oul]d be [a] great & curious blunder in dame nature. I shall look to pollen hereafter.— The pollen of useless males seems good & swells in water.—14
[7] P. S. 2d. I think I shall make out [a] good case of [the] want of perfection in Horse-chesnut [sic]— I find 140 flowers on a small truss — I think each truss produces only one or sometimes two seeds — & I have got vague notion that in each ovary there are at first many ovules— I might put it, "why should we wonder at thousands of wasted male flowers, when we see such waste of flowers of all kind?"— I have, also, somewhere got some notes on the prodigious waste of insect life — by the sticky scales on the buds buds [sic], — by the thousands, & all uselessly killed.—
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP5305.5849)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP5305,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP5305