[1]1
DOWN,
BECKENHAM, KENT.
RAILWAY STATION
ORPINGTON. S.E.R.
Aug[ust]. 21st 1881
My dear Hooker2
I cannot aid you much, or at all. I sh[oul]d. think that no one could have thought on the modification of species, without thinking of representative species. — But I feel sure that no discussion of any importance had been published on this subject before the Origin;3 for if I had known of it I sh[oul]d. [2] assuredly have alluded to it in the Origin, as I wished to gain support from all quarters. I did not then know of Von Buch[']s4 view (alluded to in my Historical Introduction in all the later editions).5 Von Buch published his "Isles Canaries" in 1836,6 & he here briefly argues that [3]7 plants spread over a continent & vary, & the varieties in time come to be species. He also argues that closely allied species are have been thus formed in the separate valleys of the Canary Islands, but not on the upper & open parts.8 I have not Baer's9 papers; but, as far as I remember, the subject is not fully discussed by him. — I quite agree about [4] Wallace's position on the ocean and continent question.10 — To return to Geograph[ical]. Distribution: As far as I know, no one ever discussed the meaning of the relation of between representative species before I did, &, as I suppose, Wallace did in his paper before [the] Linn[ean]. Soc[iety].11 Von Buch's is the nearest approach to such discussion known to me.
Ever yours | Ch. Darwin12 [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP5316.5860)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP5316,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on