[1]1
Down Bromley Kent
Nov[ember]. 3rd/642
My dear Hooker1
Many thanks for your splendid long letter.2 But first for business. — Please look carefully at [the] enclosed spec[imen]. of Dicentra thalictriformis3 & throw away: when [the] plant was young I concluded certainly that [the] tendrils were axial in or modified branches, which Mohl4 says is [the] case with some Fumariaceae.5 — You looked at them here & agreed. — But now [the] plant is old, what I thought was a branch with two leaves & ending in a tendril, looks like a gigantic leaf with 2 compound leaflets & [the] terminal part converted into [a] tendril. For I see buds in [the] fork [2] between [the] supposed branch & main stem. — Pray look carefully, you know I am profoundly ignorant, & save me from a horrid mistake. —
And now I must say a few words on the several & all interesting points in your letter.
Have you Ch[arles]. Martins6 on Sahara7 & can you lend it?
I am quite delighted with what you say about H[erbert]. Spencer's8 book;9 when I finish each number I say to myself what an awfully clever fellow he is, but when I ask myself what I have learnt, it is [3] just nothing. In the last number, however, he lists a blot in the "Origin"10 but not in any rough M.S. viz. [namely] no allusion to what the old physiologists call the nisus formativus.11 — I do not admire so much his style, & I think invariably 2 or 3 pages might be condensed into one. —
When I wrote to you I had not read Ramsay.12 — how capitally it is written — it seems that there is nothing for style like a man's dander being put up. — I think I agree largely with you about denudation13 — but the rocky lake-basin theory14 is the part which interests me at present. — It seems impossible to know [4] how much to attribute to ice, — running water, & sea. — I did not suppose that Ramsay would deny that mountains had been thrown up irregularly — & that the depressions would become valleys. — The grandest valleys I ever saw were at Tahiti & here, I do not believe, ice has done anything — anyhow there were no erratics — I said in my S[outh]. American Geology15 that rivers deepen & the sea widens valleys,16 & I am inclined largely to stick to this, adding ice to water. — I am sorry to hear that Tyndall17 has grown dogmatic.18 H[ensleigh]. Wedgwood19 [5]20 was saying the other day that T[yndall].'s writings and speaking gave him the idea of intense conceit: I hope it is not so, for he is a grand man of science.
About the Red Cowslip,21 I said that it might not [need?] to be called a species, unless it run[s] wild, solely as the most severe test of sufficient constancy of character. —
When I suggested Wallace for R[oyal]. Medal,22 I must confess I had obscure glimmering that it w[oul]d be difficult to state claims. His Amazon Book23 is nothing; his Nat[ural]. [6] Selection24 would, I suppose, rather go against him with [the] Royal Soc[iet]y. I do not know whether his admirable paper before [the] Linn[ean]. Soc[iet]y.25 is published. He wrote one good paper on Geograph[ical]. Distribution26 & he has published Geographical papers;27 but I fear it would be impossible yet to make out [a] good case. for Talking of Geog[raphical]. Distrib[ution]. I have had a Prospectus & letter from Andrew Murray,28 asking me for suggestions! I think this almost shows he is not fit for [the] subject, as he gives me no idea what his book will be, excepting that [7] the printed paper shows that all animals & all plants of all groups are to be treated of!! Do you know anything of his knowledge[?]. —
In about a fortnight I shall have finished, except [the] concluding chapter, my Book on "Variation under Domestication";29 but then I have got to go over the whole again, & this will take me very many months: I am able to work about 2 hours daily.
Thanks about Stanhopea,30 but I have at last set a capsule: my Stanhopeas flowered generously, but I cannot make Acroperas31 & [8] Gongoras32 flower, which I much wish for, as I believe Stanhopea has shown me the dodge for Acropera, which formerly so confounded me & John Scott.33 I grieve to hear about Mr McNab34 & him — — Farewell [and] forgive this awesomely long letter.
Yours affectionately, | C. Darwin35 [signature]
I cannot buy at Veitch's,36, Coryanthes37 or Cycnoches,38 if you could propagate plants of both, or either, I sh[oul]d be pleased, not that I suppose I shall ever publish my new matter on orchids. —
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP5317.5861)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP5317,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP5317