[[1]]
July 31/58.
My dear Darwin
You lucubrations have all gone to Press.1 Busk,2 Henslow[,]3 Huxley4 & I all thought that two of your after notes should go to footnotes — 1 That your work was not written with care or for publication.5 — & 2d. the capital illustration regarding cotton seeds fibre.6
I warned you that my tabulation of Bentham7 was very hasty & inaccurate. I introduced discrepancies by 1. Sometimes not always introducing as varieties well known species of Babington8 quoted as synonyms by Bentham yet somehow not alluded to as var[ietie]s [2] 2 Generally by accident but not invariably enumerating as a variety the species itself as well as Bentham[']s 1, 2, 3 &c.
All these errors tend to favor me & their elimination would I doubt not favor you — I was anxious to put the matter as favorably as I conscientiously could to my views, that the evidence might be overwhelming if the result was still against me. —
Most of the discrepancies are probably careless ones.
I have had several talks with Busk about you.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP5326.5870)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP5326,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP5326