WCP5346

Letter (WCP5346.5892)

[1]1

Kew

Monday

[2 Oct. 1871]2

Dear Darwin

I return Huxley's3 article which I have read with all the admiration I can express.4 What a wonderful Essayist he is & incomparable critic & defender of the faithful. Well, I think you are avenged of your Enemy, — but are not the happier for that — though you must be for the spirit & body which the avenger has given to the subject, & above all for the grand use he has made of your [2] own argument for confuting your enemy. What you must feel, & always feel, is, that peculiar & quite unreasonable bitter sorrowing which a man excites who praises you to your face & abuses you behind your back. — Why should this excite any thing but contempt at worst, or pity at best? & yet there is no man with generous emotions but feels more sad & sorry over such an enemy treatment than either angry or vindictive.

[3] The Psychological pages passages seem to me to be wonderfully clear & good, how tight he grasps clothes a difficult idea with in language. I was particularly struck with the paragraphs on Neurosis & Psychosis. — consciousness & it's [sic] physical basis — but really it is difficult to single out either passages or subjects, all is so good & there is so much power & acumen in the treatment of every branch of his subject. — you may call it an essay, a critique — an exposition — or discussion — an enquiry — or what else you will — you may read for one & all of these aims.

The Exposition of Mivart's5 presumptuous ignorance in citing the Catholic fathers [4] is delicious — that's the last pitfall the poor devil expected to be snared into.

The tumbling[?] over Wallace is however if not an equal feat, a far far greater service to Science.6

The appeal to conscience in the matter of the clergy & the 6 days is very powerful, & must make many a poor Devil wince in the pulpit. And the undisguised quiet contempt with which he treats the Squires & Parsons is extraordinarily humorous in it's [sic] manner.

Well, the article has been a God-send to me, for I am very very low — & cannot get my spirits up — about my poor Mother's7 state. I have just returned from Torquay. I am also in the most detestable position that a scientific [5] man, or an officer, or a gentleman, can be with my Lord & Master Ayrton8, who I have officially denounced to the 1st. Lord of the Treasury9 for his conduct to me & to Kew: & I need not say that our lives are not the happiest after such an Explosion!10. How it will all end God knows, I began the battle with heart & spirit — & gloried in it — but my Mother's [1 illeg. word deleted] condition has poisoned the whole, & I also left my sister11 very ill, even for her — so I am in the state of utter disquiet: not caring a farthing what the Treasury or Ayrton do — What a poor lot we men are — a woman would be twice as rational as I am, under twice the hard lines.

God Bless you dear old friend | Y[ou]rs affect[ionately] | J D Hooker [signature]

"ab[ou]t Mivart" is written in pencil in an unknown hand across the top LH corner of page [[1]], above "42" (possibly the letter number), also in pencil and encircled. "[Sep 71]" (including square brackets), is written in pencil in an unknown hand below "Monday" on page [[1]] and also in the top centre of page [[5]]. See note 2.
"The date is established by the relationship between this letter and the letters to J. D. Hooker, 30 September [1871] and 4 October [1871]. In 1871, the first Monday after 30 September was 2 October." Note 1, DCP-LETT-7981,” in Epsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection. <https://editorial.epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-7981> [accessed 6 June 2021].
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1825-1895). British biologist and author, known as "Darwin's Bulldog".
Huxley T. H. 1871. Mr. Darwin's critics. Contemporary Review 18: 443-476. One of the subjects was St. George Jackson Mivart (see note 5).
Mivart, St. George Jackson (1827-1900). British physician, zoologist and Roman Catholic polemicist.
Huxley discussed ARW's reservations about human evolution in Huxley, T. H. 1871 (see note 4) pp. 470-473.
Hooker (née Turner), Maria Sarah (1797-1872). Lady Hooker, married W. J. Hooker in 1815. Collector and illustrator of mosses.
Ayrton, Acton Smee (1816-1886). British barrister and politician. Commissioner of Works, 1869-1873.
Gladstone, William Ewart (1809-1898). British politician; Prime Minister 1868-74, 1880-5, 1886, 1892-4; Chancellor of the Exchequer 1852-5, 1859-66, 1873-4, 1880-2.
Ayrton, as Commissioner of Works (see endnote 8), the government department in charge of Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, had authorised specific cost-cutting operations without giving Hooker notice.
Joseph Hooker's sister, Evans-Lombe (née Hooker), Elizabeth. (1820-1898). Fourth child of W. J. and M. S. (née Turner) Hooker. Married Thomas Robert Evens-Lombe in 1853.

Please cite as “WCP5346,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP5346