Search: 1860-1869::1863::03::17 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 110 of 10 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Journal of Horticulture
Date:
[17–24 Mar 1863]
Source of text:
Journal of Horticulture and Cottage Gardener n.s. 4 (1863): 237
Summary:

Reports the observations of Hermann Crüger and John Scott that fruit is set by orchids whose flowers never open and that pollen-tubes are emitted from pollen-masses still in their proper position. These cases convince CD that in Orchids he underestimated the power of tropical orchids to produce seed without insect aid but he is not shaken in his belief that the structure of the flowers is mainly related to insect agency.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Darwin, Emma
To:
Darwin, W. E.
Date:
[17 March 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 219.1: 71
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
Julius Haast
Date:
17 March 1863
Source of text:
MS papers 37, folder 205, no. 536, Haast family papers, Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, N.Z
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
17 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 187
Summary:

Lyell’s Antiquity of man lacks originality.

Statements in Lyell provoke CD to determine exact publication date of Origin and JDH’s introductory essay [to Flora Tasmaniae].

CD now believes in repeated periods of global cooling and migration.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
17 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.291)
Summary:

His better opinion [of work of Boucher de Perthes].

Explains his position on CL’s treatment of species.

Mentions positive response to his ideas on the part of a German professor [Ernst Haeckel], Alphonse de Candolle, and a botanical palaeontologist [Gaston de Saporta].

Notes negative reaction of entomologists.

Mentions Falconer’s objections [to Antiquity].

Mentions work of Hooker.

Comments on paper by Owen ["On the aye-aye", Rep. BAAS 32 (1862) pt 2: 114–16]

and CD’s review of Bates’s paper [Collected papers 2: 87–92].

Thinks Natural History Review is excellent.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Charles Locock
Date:
17 March 1863
Source of text:
SI D MS 554 A
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Cornelia Augusta Hewett Crosse
Date:
17 March 1863
Source of text:
Hunt MS, BuL
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
John Percy
Date:
17 March 1863
Source of text:
Bence Jones (1870a), 2: 461-2
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
From:
Thomas White Woodbury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 181: 150
Summary:

Bee species of different sizes build cells the same size.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas White Woodbury
Date:
[after 17 Mar 1863]
Source of text:
International Bee Research Association, Eva Crane Library
Summary:

Thanks for the artificial comb.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project