From T. H. Huxley   28 June 1881

Warkworth | Northumberland

June 28. 1881

My dear Darwin

Two or three days ago I received a letter from Haeckel telling me the circumstances of the affair to which you allude1

It appears that he had been promised the Humboldt stipend—which is at the disposition of the Berlin Academy, but that when the time came in spite of the support by Helmholz, Peters & Beyrich the grant was refused2  Haeckel says that Reichert, Virchow & DuBois Raymond opposed it on account of his being “ein hervorragender Förderer der Darwinischen Irrlehren und des Wissenschaftlichen Materialismus”3 further because he had done more harm than good to Science & because his zoological monographs were of no value.

Of course one has to remember that this is an ex parte statement—but Virchow’s treatment of Haeckel has been so unfair in other cases, that I am disposed to think it represents the actual state of the case pretty fairly.4

It is a great piece of injustice and I wish I saw my way to remedy it. Haeckel requests that the Royal Society or the British Association might give him a subsidy  But he wants £400 or £500—that is to say a sum far beyond the capacity of the Donation Fund of the Royal Society—and very much larger than the British Association is likely to possess or to be willing to grant for a single purpose.

As to the Government Fund & Grant— in the first place we have no Funds until February and in the second though I quite agree with you, that our money might be very usefully expended for investigations such as those Haeckel proposes to undertake, I doubt whether the committee would give so large a sum to a foreigner—5

However that may be the question could not even be raised until next spring & Haeckel wants to go out in September

I see that Haeckel says at the end of his letter that he has written to you so I need not have troubled you with the beginning of this epistle

My colleague & I came here yesterday to look at the weir & we are off to Clitheroe this evening6

But before I left on Monday morning news came that a house was to be had at Grasmere—which will end my wife’s correspondence with a large part of the United Kingdom not forgetting Mrs Darwin7

With kindest remembrances to her & all your party

Ever | Yours very truly | T H Huxley

See letter to T. H. Huxley, 22 June 1881. Ernst Haeckel’s letter to Huxley, dated 21 June 1881, is in the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archive (Huxley 17: 209).
Haeckel’s opponents were Karl Reichert, Rudolf Virchow, and Emil Du Bois-Reymond. ‘Ein hervorragender Förderer der Darwinischen Irrlehren und des Wissenschaftlichen Materialismus’: a prominent promoter of the Darwinian heresy and of scientific materialism (German).
In September 1877, Virchow had given an address at a meeting of the German Association of Naturalists and Physicians in Munich, arguing against the teaching of Darwinian theory (Virchow 1877); his talk was a response to one Haeckel had given at the same meeting. Haeckel later published a longer piece on freedom in science and teaching that was translated into English by Huxley (Haeckel 1878b, Haeckel 1879; for more on the conflict, see Correspondence vol. 27, letter from Ernst Haeckel, 9 February 1879 and n. 3).
Huxley was a secretary of the Royal Society of London, which had access to a government grant (see letter to T. H. Huxley, 22 June 1881 and n. 2). For more on sources of funding, see the letter to Ernst Haeckel, 25 June 1881 and n. 3, and the letter to Francis Darwin, 26 June [1881], n. 6.
Huxley refers to his duties as an inspector of fisheries; the other inspector was Spencer Walpole.
Grasmere is a village in the Lake District; Huxley, with his wife, Henrietta Anne Huxley, and some of their children spent a summer holiday there in August 1881 (L. Huxley ed. 1900, 2: 312).

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-13223,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-13223