My dear Sir
Dr. Hooker2 thinks you would not grudge giving me a little bit of information; I want only so much as would go in the compass of a short note.— It regards the higher marine plants, of which the male & female elements of reproduction are pretty clearly made out.— Are such plants generally or universally dioecious, or monoecious, or hermaphrodite in the sense that the male & female organs are so close together that the male element & of the same individual would apparently always fertilize the adjoining female, as appears to be the case (whether or not really) in common hermaphrodite phanerogams.—3
Can you answer this question? If so I shd be very much obliged for an answer at your leisure.— I have long been interested in following out Andrew Knight’s notion that all plants occasionally cross with another individual.—4
I was very glad to hear some time ago of your safe return after your long voyage.—5
When last I saw you it was at Oxford, & the remembrance of that very pleasant week to me, often recurs to my memory.—6
Pray believe me, My dear Sir | Yours very sincerely | Charles Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-2021F,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on