Edward Sabine to Faraday   11 November 1852

Woolwich, Nov. 11, ‘52

Dear Faraday

I return Mr Wolf’s german letter1 with thanks. The french letter2 shall be given to Mr Christie for communication3. Humboldt wrote me some time since an account of Mr. Wolfe’s discovery of the connexion between the Magnetic variations & the solar spots, & remarked that I had preceded him in publication by between 4 & 5 months4: and I have reason to believe that he will notice my priority in his forthcoming vol. of Cosmos5, which I am glad of, as the thing itself has excited but little interest in this country, & foreign countries are not always ready to do justice to a man of a country which is comparatively regardless, of a matter in which they take a far greater interest. I believe that I have a claim to be considered as the first announcer of the probable existence of a secular magnetic period in the Sun.

Mr. Wolf has been forestalled by Lamont in the period of the variations of the magnetic declination6. By myself in the period of the variations of the magnetic dip & total force, & in the period of the supposed irregular disturbances or storms - and in the coincidence of these periods with that of the solar spots. There remains to him of original suggestion therefore the examination of the earlier solar spot observations from the time of Fabricius7, & their connection with the recent far more ample research of Schwabe a supposed correction of the period from 10.33 to 11.11 years - the suggestion of a connexion between the solar spots & variable stars, which would be indeed surprising, as one cannot well see how the solar spots are to affect beyond the solar system, & it would seem to make the solar magnetic period only one phenomenon of a general cosmical magnetic period. The proof of the years of maximum solar spots being years of dryness & fertility would seem to be very difficult to establish if the proof is to extend, as it ought to do, over the surface of the Globe generally. I should doubt greatly whether this will prove more than a mere speculation.

The connexion between the appearance of Aurora & the magnetic storms has long since been established - the greater frequency of the storms carries with it therefore the greater frequency of Aurora.

Robinson8 at Belfast9 suggested that the variable light of the stars might be analogous to the solar spots, as indicative of a magnetic period, but not the same period for sun & stars[.]

Sincerely yours | Edward Sabine

That is to the Royal Society. See note 8, letter 2586.
See Sabine (1852).
Which he did in Humboldt (1846-58), 4: 81. The reason why Sabine was aware of this was because Elizabeth Juliana Sabine, née Leeves (1807-1879, see DNB under Edward Sabine) was the translator.
Lamont (1852).
Johannes Fabricius (1587-1615, NDB). German astronomer.
Thomas Romney Robinson (1792-1882, DNB). Director of the Armagh Observatory, 1823-1882.
That is at the Belfast meeting of the British Association.

Bibliography

HUMBOLDT, Friedrich Wilhelm Heinrich Alexander von (1846-58): Cosmos: Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe, 4 volumes, London.

LAMONT, Johann von (1852): “On the Ten-year Period which exhibits itself in the Diurnal Motion of the Magnetic Needle”, Phil. Mag., 3: 428-35.

SABINE, Edward (1852): “On Periodical Laws discoverable in the mean effects of the larger Magnetic Disturbances - No.II”, Phil. Trans., 142: 103-24.

Please cite as “Faraday2592,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 2 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday2592