Search: letter in document-type 
1800-1809::1806::09 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 19 of 9 items

From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Samuel Goodenough
Date:
2 Sep 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/11/53, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

His periodical publications delayed by his long stay in London. Gives an account of his correspondence with and about [Richard] Salisbury: received copy of Salisbury's pamphlet ["The generic characters in the English Botany"] and letter signifying that if Smith made concessions he would not publish it. Contrary to Salisbury's claims Salisbury's sisters deny any knowledge of the business. Salisbury has told [Archibald] Menzies he would "give £500" to have never written it but has continued to attack Smith in "Paradisus Londinensis". Is particularly hurt by Sir Joseph Banks' obliviousness to the personal nature of the attacks but has long "been aware of the queerness of this great man" and is now glad he took Goodenough's advice and did name himself only the editor "Flora Graeca", as Banks wanted. As part of an experiment on Banks' humour requested a drawing for use in "Exotic Botany", which was grudgingly granted. Believes his work on 'Globba marantina' and other 'Scitamineae' in "Exotic Botany", in part assisted by [William] Roscoe's paper to Linnean Society, is excellent. [Francis] Buchanan has given him his whole collection of Nepal and Mysore plants, all his manuscript descriptions, and nearly 200 drawings for publication in "Exotic Botany".

Literary plans for winter: intends to finish "Flora Britannica", write a popular introduction to botany, to finish and publish Linnaeus' "Lapland tour", besides going on with "Flora Graeca" and his two periodical works ["Exotic Botany" and "English Botany"]. The first fasciculi of "Flora Graeca" has just printed but with possible errors to correct. Struggled with the 'Umbellatae', 'Silene', and 'Dianthus' in "Prodromus Florae Graecae". The sore on his leg has completely healed but left a "tremendous scar". Finances of the Linnean Society extremely healthy. The alarming state of the nation; "we have only the choice of evils, and perhaps not even that". The new Bishop of Norwich [Henry Bathurst (1744-1837)] a "very amiable, benignant character".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
Text Online
From:
Jeanne-Antoinette Ampère (mère d'Ampère)
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
8 septembre 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1943), p. 862.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
From:
William Roscoe
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
8 Sep 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/36, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Further remarks on his 'Scitamineae' paper; transcribes note to be added explaining Smith's discovery which has abolished 'Colebrookia', and discusses possibility of abolishing 'Globba'. Agrees that Smith should reprint the first sheet of "Flora Graeca", on basis that Smith is the editor, not the author, and to make other corrections. Has not seen issue of "Exotic botany" containing the plant named after him ['Roscoea'].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Samuel Goodenough
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
9 Sep 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/11/54, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received Smith's letter of 2 September. Describes charms of the neighbourhood of Boxlet, his new living. Discusses Smith's dispute with Salisbury: Salisbury's use of his sisters' names in a false manner "degrades him from the rank of gentleman"; believes Salisbury wishes he never wrote his pamphlet ["Generic characters of English Botany"] but does not know how to retract it; does not intend to read any of Salisbury's "Paradisus Londinensis"; has thought him "too wild to take a lead" since a conversation with him about Salisbury changing the nomenclature of 'Erica'; advises Smith not to enter into a squabble with Sir Joseph Banks [over his unsympathetic attitude towards to Salisbury dispute], "like all great men, he in his way is open to the tittle tattle of designing persons"; Smith should mortify Salisbury with "contemptuous silence"; blames [William George] Maton for allowing the pamphlet into the Linnean Society whilst he was in the chair.

Smith should use the verncaular form of [John] Sibthorp and [Peter Simon] Pallas in his Errata, suggests wording for an explanatory note. His aquaintance with the Bishop of Norwich [Henry Bathurst (1744-1837)]. A botanist, Mrs Brereton, is coming to Boxley. In Boxley has observed 'Hieracium umbellatum', 'Chrysosplenium oppositifolium', 'Hedypnois hieracioides', and 'Crepis biennis'. Has looked in vain in Rochester for 'Viola hirta'. Thinks 'Orchis militaris' is not a variety. [Thomas] Marsham visited after staying with [Aylmer Bourke] Lambert, deplores Lambert's weakness in dispossessing himself of his landed property by giving the inheritance to his "unworthy sisters". His own daughters are still looking for husbands, "impoverished times for such a commodity".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
Text Online
From:
Daburon (Abbé)
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
14 septembre 1806
Source of text:
Fonds André-Marie Ampère chemise 359 (la localisation donnée par Louis DE LAUNAY dans la Correspondance du Grand Ampère est aujourd'hui erronée), Archives de l'Académie des sciences, Paris
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
Antoinette Carron (mère de Julie)
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
17 septembre 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1943), p. 862.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
From:
Shute Barrington
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
17 Sep 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/20/67, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Forwards remarks by [John] Harriman on 'Lichens'; Smith one of the few botanists competent enough to form a judgement.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
Text Online
From:
Pierre-Simon Ballanche
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
18 septembre 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1943), p. 863-864.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
Jean-Marie Périsse-Marsil
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
26 septembre 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 310.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère