Search: 1800-1809::1806::01 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 22 items

Text Online
From:
Pierre Maine de Biran
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
20 janvier 1806
Source of text:
N.A.F. ms 14605, f° 32-37 [note A. Robinet], Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Pierre Maine de Biran
Date:
1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 308.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Jacques Roux-Bordier
Date:
1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 800.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Jacques Roux-Bordier
Date:
1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 309-310.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Elise Carron (sœur de Julie)
Date:
janvier 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 295-296.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Élise Carron (sœur de Julie)
Date:
4 janvier 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1943), p. 858.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Claude-Julien Bredin
Date:
18 janvier 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 295.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
From:
Thomas Andrew Knight
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
1806
Source of text:
L&P/12/132, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
James Robertson
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
1806
Source of text:
L&P/12/137, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
William Roscoe
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
22 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/28, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Hopes Smith's health is good. Intends to send copy of his Monandrian essay but busy correcting his "[Life and Pontificate of] Leo [the Tenth]" for second edition; defends the book against criticism in journals and "Critical Review" by stating the critics' ignorance of the period.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
William Roscoe
Date:
25 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/29, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Has been waiting for Roscoe's 'Sciatamineae' paper so he can proceed with plants from that family in "Exotic botany". His leg still healing but is much better.

Indignant at a critical review of Roscoe's book ["Life and Pontificate of Leo the Tenth"]; [William Fitt] Drake's theory as to the author. Fears imminent second edition of his "[Sketch of a ] tour [of the continent]" will be similarly treated. Gives his complimentary opinion of "Leo", though agrees with "country gentlemen" in wishing for a translation of the poetry and quotations and questions use of English in another section.

Sir Joseph Banks has offered to mediate between himself and [Richard] Salisbury, who initially thought Smith was being too severe until further explanation. Received another "most abusive & rascally" letter from Salisbury offering to resign vice-presidentship and detailing illegal property. [William] Salisbury [(d 1823/1829)], the nurseryman, says his name is ruined for £500 a year as people assume he belongs to the Yorkshire [Richard] Salisbury and will not deal with him.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Robert Brown
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
12 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/88, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Frustrated in giving a full account of of his New Holland [Australia] desiderata, Smith's labours in this area have facilitated his researches but still unsure on some specimens, in particular 'Eucalyptus'. Relates the misfortunes of [Matthew Flinder's] expedition to Australia [on which Brown was the naturalist] but despite these and the failure to complete the planned survey approximately 3000 species have been brought home, Brown hopes at least a third are new. [Ferdinand] Bauer has made approximately 1600 drawings. Appointed Librarian of the Linnean Society. Pleased to hear that Smith is recovering from his "severe indisposition".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Bostock
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
26 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/13, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for specimens of native camphor; at present the nature of the substance is incomprehensible. Would like to become FLS; states his involvement in establishing the [Liverpool] Botanic Garden as example of his promoting botany. [John] Shepherd [(c 1764-1836, curator Liverpool Botanic Garden] going on well; considerable additions made to the collection since Smith left. Comments on "unprincipled attack" on [William] Roscoe's "Leo X" in "Critical Review"; pained to observe such a "spirit of illiberality" in one of their most popular periodicals.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Hardwicke
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Jan [1806]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/80, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Acknowledges receipt of manuscript book and letters to forward. Hopes Smith has recovered from his confinement. Will shortly send Smith the "Hortus Malabaricus".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Charles Dietrich Eberhard Konig
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
8 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/39, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received Smith's letter of 10 December [1805]. Surprised that Smith's "antagonist" [Richard Salisbury] has taken his "animosity so very far"; believes there may be more than botanical causes for the schism and that Salisbury is "again brewing something" against Smith; Smith's use of [Jean-Jacques] Rousseau [(1712-1778), philosopher] motto in second volume of "Exotic botany" will perpetuate the "unworthy affair".

No original specimen of 'Plinia' in Sir Joseph Banks' herbarium; the plant they consider the same is specimen sent by [Alexander] Anderson [(1748?-1811), botanist] from West Indies, sending Anderson's description and drawing [extant]. Expects "Annals of Botany" to cease publication with next number as it is proving to be a losing concern. Salisbury has offered a paper on splitting of 'Ornithogalum' into two genera, calling one 'Gagea' after Sir Thomas Gage. Parcel for Smith from Willdenow; he wishes for the new British 'Salix'.

[Postscript] Specimens, descriptions, and drawings brought from New Holland by [Robert] Brown and [Ferdinand Lucas] Bauer [(1760-1826), botanical artist] "are by far the most excellent that ever resulted from any expedition", numbers exceed 2000. Proposes new genus 'Brunonia' in Brown's honour. [Ambroise] Beauvois [(1752-1820)] has given name 'Ventenatia' to a genus of 'Malvacca', at Ventenat's own choice; proposes Smith's 'Ventenatia' as genus for Brown.

Drawing and description of 'Plinia'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
William Roxburgh
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/25/16, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Pleased to of recovery of Smith's health in his letter of 2 [January 1806]; his own bad health forced him to leave Bengal. Regrets his and Smith's missing each other in Liverpool; now little chance of their meeting until Smith comes to London in April. Contemplating a return to Bengal as the climate here is not agreeable. Comparing his specimens with [Aylmer Bourke] Lambert's; Lambert has almost convinced him that [Charles] Konig's 'Argostis linearis' is Smith's 'Panicum dactylon'; recommends Sir William Jones' figure of former in "Asiatick Researches" vol 4; requests Smith's assistance with all his Indian plants.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Aylmer Bourke Lambert
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/6/48, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for parcel of herrings. [William] Roxburgh's collection of plants in London, is working on his "Flora Indica". Roxburgh informed that [Francis] Buchanan is on the way home with the Marquess [Richard Colley Wellesley, 1st Marquess Wellesley (1760-1842) Governor-General of India, 1798-1805]. Has received specimen of 'Fabricia laevigata' in flower. Sir Jospeh Banks is recovered and in the library again. Comments on the "charming plants" in Smith's last two numbers [probably "Exotic Botany"] but informed by [Robert] Brown that there is already a a genus given to [Etienne Pierre] Ventenat in a "Flora of Benin" published in Paris so likely Ventenat has already approved of it.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Aylmer Bourke Lambert
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
[14 Jan 1806]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/6/49, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for turkey. Glad to hear that [Richard Salisbury] will soon lose his title [presumably as vice-president of Linnean Society], "no one ought to mind what he says or writes more than when a puppy barks". Sending specimen of 'Fabricia', also has two new species of "'Leptasperum'?". Has basket of "Lambert nuts" for Smith, told by [James] Sowerby that he has the drawing of it, believes it a new species mentioned by [Peter Simon] Pallas in his last tour. Has a 'Eucalyptus', 'Melaleuca veridiflora', and 'Styphalia' from Amboyna, [Indonesia].

[Letter incomplete: several lines from foot of second folio cropped, presumed destroyed]

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
11 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/6, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Intends to keep dedication to Smith in ["The gardener's and botanist's dictionary"]. Considers Smith "the establishment", glad of Smith's decision to only neglect [Richard] Salisbury, whom he never "much affected either as a man or a botanist". Discussion of botanical terminology.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
James Sowerby
Date:
[1806]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/JS/11, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Returns 6 drawings and two 'Conferva' specimens to be figured as t.2427 and t.2428 [of "English botany"], to finish no.247 June. Also returns Sowerby's "beautiful drawings" for the Duke of Bedford [John Russell, 6th Duke]; difficulty whether to call some 'Mespili' or 'Crataegi'. They intend to arrive back in London shortly.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London