Search: letter in document-type 
1800-1809::1806 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 129 items

Text Online
From:
Pierre-Simon Ballanche
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
16 mars 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 299-300-301-302-303.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
From:
Francis Hamilton
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
17 Mar 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/126, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Leaving for India soon. Has materials for a "Flora of Nepal": 114 drawings, mostly of orchids, and 1100-1200 specimens and descriptions, of which 800-900 are new, indexed according to Jussieu's arrangement. Also has 131 drawings of plants from Mysoor, many unknown or previously badly described, many descriptions and some specimens. Offers to entrust them to Smith if they would prove useful for publications.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Francis Hamilton
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Mar 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/127, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Frustrated in his intentions to go India by the Chairman of the Court of Directors [Sir Francis Baring (1740-1810) 1st baronet] of the East India Company so is going to Scotland for three weeks. Hopes to meet Smith after to discuss arrangements for his Nepalese flora materials; proposes that Smith publish the drawings and full descriptions in his "Exotic Botany" and he will separately prepare a Prodroumus like [Carl Peter] Thunberg's "Flora Japponica". Has seen [Richard] Salisbury and his work, advises Smith not to embroil himself in a controversy.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Pierre Maine de Biran
Date:
21 mars 1806
Source of text:
Fonds André-Marie Ampère chemise 393 quarto, Archives de l'Académie des sciences, Paris
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
From:
Francis Humberston Mackenzie
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
22 Mar 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/1, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Replying to Smith's letter of 21 December [1805]. [Thomas Williams] Simmonds has died [(d 1804), Mackenzie's naturalist], who had made great progress with his indices but not collecting, and his gardener James Mackie has left, so has been unable to do much in botany. Will look through his notes and collection for Smith's requests. Has two boxes of living plants to send [William] Roscoe. Making ornithological notes for [John] Latham. Lady Seaforth is returning home with description of, plus head and claws of a "magnificent" vulture, it is possibly a falcon. List of fifteen plants he is sending for Mr Shepherd, apologises for its deficiencies.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir Thomas Frankland
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
23 Mar 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/15/31, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Lady Frankland's sister, Mrs Courtney, died of a pleuritic cold last Christmas and her husband shortly followed her, dying of a "broken heart" "literally & anatomically". Archdeacon Pierson's herbarium still unsold and his collection of 800 portrait prints, including "semi-caricatures of Dr Cullen, & other Scotch physicians, & men of eminence" will be be sold in London.

Had difficulties securing hotel rooms in London for this spring which shows "how popular this kind of residence is become".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Charles Dietrich Eberhard Konig
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Mar 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/40, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Contrary to [James] Sowerby's statement, he did not intend to imply he would defend Smith in print against [Richard] Salisbury's pamphlet ["The generic characters in the English Botany" (1806)], but has been openly giving his opinion in conversation. Warns Smith against responding in any of his works as it would perpetuate the "disgraceful affair". Glad to hear "Florae Graecae prodromus" is printing, but sorry to hear Smith's health not good enough to lecture at Royal Institution.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
unknown
To:
Charles Blagden
Date:
30 March 1806
Source of text:
L&P/12/134/1, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
William Roscoe
Date:
2 Apr 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/31, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for Roscoe's letter of 1 March. Critiques in detail Roscoe's paper on Scitamineae plants; believes it will do Roscoe "great honour" as a botanist he is the first to give a "plausible account" of these genera; a point that could have been alluded to; corrections of punctuation, quotations, spelling, and words for characteristics; asks whether 'Roscoia' is to remain in 'Amomum'.

[Richard] Salisbury has published a "most abusive & lying pamphlet" against "English Botany" ["Generic characters in the English Botany"], which he has ignored, along with two letters received since his last conclusive one. No one is paying Salisbury any attention and are anxious for Smith to keep his silence. Composed new introductory letter for Royal Institution, refuting Salisbury and not honouring him with apparent notice. Transcribes a mocking "motto" for [Salisbury] and [William] Hooker's [(1779-1832), botanical artist] "Paradisus [Londinensis]".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Archibald Menzies
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
3 Apr 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/24/18, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Pleased to hear Smith is recovered from his late "tedious" indisposition. Unable to accommodate Smith and [William Fitt] Drake as usual this year as the house is being redecorated, and as his business has increased he is making more use of rooms than previously, and their maid Sally has also left. Will endeavour to acquire alternative accommodation for Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Samuel Goodenough
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
4 Apr 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/11/51, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Comments on Smith's Latinity in the "Flora Graeca" and justifies his use of "etc." for saving the trouble of listing every author of authority who has written on Greek flora. Advice on the delination of [John] Sibthorp's name. Small alteration to title page, and to the title of "Prodromus Florae Graecae".

Longs to hear when Smith will be in London. Attended Linnean Society meeting in March, "where to my astonishment, [Richard] Salisbury presented his printed squib against "E[nglish] Botany", ["Generic characters of "English Botany"]". Does not believe [William George] Maton, who was in the chair, should have allowed it to be read. [James] Dickson, [Thomas] Marsham, [Alexander] Macleay, and Sir T[homas Gery] Cullum were all of Goodenough's opinion that the Linnean Society "was not the arena on which any of its members ought to engage". [Jonas] Dryander also agrees with Goodenough. Pointed out to several fellows the weakness and impotency of the attack.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
David Pennant
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
[6 Apr 1806]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/36, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Would like to see [John] Sibthorp's notes on the ornithology of Greece, in particular Sibthorp's copy of Camus' translation of Aristotle, to see his observations on animals and pests common to Britain, migration of birds, and elucidation of Greek bird names.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
7 April 1806
Source of text:
MM/6/37, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
William Roscoe
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
7 Apr 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/32, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Responds to Smith's remarks on his Scitamineae paper, transcribes a new opening paragraph and makes other additions and corrections. Smith and himself should take strength against their attackers: [Richard] Salisbury's pamphlet ["Generic characters in the English Botany"] attacking Smith, and his own criticical reviewers in "Critical Review" and "Edinburgh Journal"; has written a paper against the latter. Thanks for numbers of "Exotic botany" but insists on purchasing the rest.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Jules Armand Guillaume Boucher de Crèvecoeur
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Apr 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/ADD/14, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Activities and publications.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Samuel Goodenough
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Apr 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/11/52, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Invites Smith to Rochester whilst he is in London. Leaves the decision of his becoming a vice-president of Linnean Society to Smith, warning that his clerical duties restrain his abscences from home. Believes there will be no end to the war "while Buonaparte loves to play at sceptres & balls", has never heard of "such imperious doings [...] since the world began".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Johnes
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Apr [1806]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/16/79, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for Smith's letter and condolences, "the blow has been most severe, and more so, from bring so very unexpected" [possibly death of his sister, Elizabeth, wife of Hanbury Williams]. Will assist Smith in the publication of his "Tour of Hafod", though warns his circle of friends has reduced considerably. Not surprised by [Richard] Salisbury's conduct. Glad Smith likes [Benjamin] Malkin's [(1769-1842), antiquarian] book ["The Scenery, Antiquities, and Biography of South Wales" (1804)], who is a friend of his. Mariamne [Johnes, his daughter] is well and walks 5 to 7 miles daily. news. Asks that they be remembered to the Mr and Mrs Kindersley; "had our strange sister [Charlotte] followed his advice it would have been better for her".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Claude-Julien Bredin
Date:
26 avril 1806
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 304-305.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
Jean-Stanislas Couppier
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
27 avril cachet postal 1806
Source of text:
Fonds André-Marie Ampère chemise 382, Archives de l'Académie des sciences, Paris
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
Claude-Julien Bredin
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
30 avril 1806
Source of text:
Fonds André-Marie Ampère chemise 334, Archives de l'Académie des sciences, Paris
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère